Anthropic Overtakes OpenAI on Revenue, Reshaping the AI Race

For years the story of the AI boom had a clear protagonist: OpenAI, the company that put ChatGPT in front of the world. That story is being rewritten. Anthropic, the rival founded by former OpenAI researchers, has now pulled ahead of it on revenue, and on paper value too.

Anthropic is running at a roughly $47 billion annualized revenue rate, up from about $30 billion earlier in the year and $10 billion for all of last year, according to reporting from Fortune. OpenAI, in its most recent disclosure, put itself on course for $25 billion to $33 billion. On that measure, the challenger is now comfortably in front.

Measure	Anthropic	OpenAI
Revenue rate	Roughly $47 billion annualized, up from about $30 billion earlier in the year	On course for $25 billion to $33 billion, per its most recent disclosure
Valuation	About $965 billion after a $65 billion funding round	Now edged past by Anthropic's figure
Consumer reach	Does not have that reach and, for now, is not chasing it	Well over a billion people using its products each month
Profitability	Says it expects to get there ahead of OpenAI, but years out	Projected to run large operating losses this year

How did Anthropic overtake OpenAI on revenue?

The engine of Anthropic's surge is not a chatbot but a coding tool. Claude Code has become one of the fastest-growing products in software, the kind of thing developers start paying for and then cannot work without. That has translated into revenue that compounds rather than spikes, because coding assistants get used every working day.

The valuation has moved with it. Anthropic closed a $65 billion funding round that values the company at about $965 billion, backed by heavyweight investors including Altimeter, Dragoneer, Greenoaks and Sequoia. That figure edges past OpenAI's, a symbolic reversal for a company that started as the smaller, safety-focused sibling.

Is Anthropic more profitable than OpenAI?

Two things are worth saying plainly, because the headline numbers invite overstatement. First, revenue is not profit. Both companies are spending enormous sums on computing power, and OpenAI in particular is projected to run large operating losses this year as it chases scale. Anthropic says it expects to reach profitability ahead of OpenAI, but "ahead" here means years out, not now.

Second, scale and revenue are different races. OpenAI still commands a vast consumer footprint, with well over a billion people using its products each month, a reach Anthropic does not have and, for now, is not chasing. Anthropic's lead is built on enterprises and developers paying real money, not on the sheer number of casual users.

A shifting pecking order

What is genuinely new is the sense that the field has more than one clear leader. A year ago the conversation assumed OpenAI out front and everyone else in pursuit. Now Google's Gemini is closing on the consumer side and Anthropic has taken the revenue crown on the enterprise side. The race is no longer a procession. It is a contest, and the ordering changes with almost every quarter.